Transkrip diambil dari YouTube. Klik timestamp biru untuk melompat ke posisi tersebut di pemutar.
0:08 Brail TV. 0:16 >> Peace be upon you. How are you, Mr. 0:20 Ihsanuddin Nursi? 0:22 >> Peace be upon you. 0:25 >> Wow, great. May 0:26 >> Allah bless you. 0:27 >> Ah, Mr. Ihsanuddin Nursi, 0:29 >> how are you? These days, from the New 0:31 York Times, it seems like we're waiting 0:34 for a time bomb. But why? Maybe Mr. 0:37 Iksanuddin Nursi can explain. In the 0:41 midst of this, we're said to want to 0:43 create our own stock exchange ranking. 0:46 Wow, this is capable of creating its 0:48 own rating, this person said it's bad 0:49 with a mirror face behind or something. 0:52 But there's also what's it called? The 0:55 FTSE Stock Exchange. The listeners are 0:58 confused. This one says it's okay, this 1:00 one says it's not okay. Is it true that 1:02 there are foreign stooges or what, Mr. 1:05 Ihsanuddin Nursi? Among the 1:07 extraordinary state losses from 1:10 state-owned companies, 52%of 1:12 state-owned companies are losing. Are 1:14 state-owned companies protected or 1:16 given funds? How come, Mr.? Does it 1:20 need to be amputated or what? And also 1:23 other stories that might be from abroad 1:26 , I mentioned developments this morning 1:28 . It seems 57 versus 50 cabinet seats 1:33 and 14 seats for Arab parties in Israel 1:36 . Eh, in the midst of the palm oil 1:39 issue that seems to be spreading 1:41 through neighboring countries to Israel 1:43 , what kind of blessing does this seem 1:45 to be, Bang? Meanwhile, Boeli still has 1:48 the potential to appear in Indonesia. 1:51 Hmm, it's even crowded in Jogja or 1:53 Prambanan. What will happen? But 1:56 suddenly three countries in the Mecca 1:58 alliance visited Iran. This seems cool 2:02 if Muslims unite. Please, Bang 2:05 Ihsanuddin Nursi. Enlightenment for all 2:07 of us in the next 40 minutes. Tafadol 2:10 Bang. 2:14 >> Bismillahirrahmanirrahim. 2:17 Alhamdulillahiabbil alamin subhanaka la 2:21 ilmaana inimana ilman Allah sayidina 2:33 Muhammad Sayidina Muhammad. We start 2:37 with the Mecca alliance visit. 2:41 >> Oh yes, 2:42 >> to Iran. 2:43 >> Because this is something extraordinary 2:46 . 2:47 >> H, 2:48 >> from the perspective of the Sunni H 2:51 sect, 2:52 >> meets Shia, so they say. 2:57 >> So Susi, huh? Sunnis. 3:00 >> Yes, so Sushi. 3:04 >> If it's because I don't want to get 3:06 caught up in the sectarianism of the 3:08 reckoning. It's important. 3:10 >> So, I'm 3:13 >> taking a stance of a unified Islam 3:15 >> for one Islam, that is 3:18 >> truly one Islam. So I'm not thinking 3:20 about Shia, about Sunni, 3:23 >> but from the perspective of those who 3:25 follow the sect. Wow, this is a meeting 3:27 between 3:28 >> Sunni and Shia, they say. Well, if we 3:33 look at the story of this meeting, from 3:36 the desire to visit here, 3:39 >> it actually illustrates that 3:47 >> Pakistan, which has nuclear weapons, is 3:49 the one that counts. 3:51 >> Yes. He he he. 3:52 >> Pakistan has nuclear weapons and 3:55 Pakistan happens to be a direct 3:57 neighbor of 3:57 >> Iran, with Iran in terms of territory. 4:04 >> So this meeting, ee ee, is the 4:09 beginning of a desire to sit down and 4:13 respect each other. Well, that's my 4:15 sentence. Sit down and respect each 4:18 other. 4:20 >> At least with the presence of the three 4:23 of them as the initial lobby, ee the 4:26 airport in Riyad will no longer be 4:29 attacked. 4:30 >> Yes. Take a break. 4:34 >> Take a break. The airport will no 4:36 longer be attacked. The airport will 4:38 not close. Although later the airports 4:41 in Jeddah and Medina were not attacked, 4:45 ee because they are indeed centers for 4:48 worship in Medina and Mecca. 4:52 >> Well, from here, we see an opportunity 4:56 for this Shia-Sunni unity. 5:00 >> Yes. The 5:01 >> unity of these countries is quite 5:03 influential. They 5:05 >> face what they themselves, 5:12 >> Washington, New York, and London, call 5:17 >> full of uncertainty. Oh, and the reason 5:23 is because Trump fulfills Netanyahu's 5:26 wishes. Well, as soon as Trump said he 5:30 wanted Netanyahu, the numbers I 5:32 mentioned earlier 5:34 >> are in line with the predicted numbers 5:36 in Washington. The numbers in America. 5:41 >> America. Yes. In comparison, in 5:43 >> line with that, the 5:44 >> Democrats are in ruins, they are in 5:46 >> ruins. No. Meanwhile, Obama is cursing 5:50 Trump to death. Wow, this is the first 5:53 >> time Obama has cursed Trump. That's 5:54 >> extraordinary, isn't it? Eh, this means 5:58 the global stage is witnessing what is 5:59 called inanifa. In fact, inan, the 6:11 devil is truly weak. If we realize that 6:26 they will always reach a point of 6:27 conflict with each other. We hear this, 6:33 ... 6:36 >> Listen carefully, sir. 6:38 >> Yes, that's right. Listen carefully. 6:41 >> He. 6:42 >> So that we better understand our 6:44 position, where this nation stands, 6:47 >> okay? Okay. If we see that Israel is 6:52 like that, America is like that, and 6:55 Islam tends to be united, then Muslims 7:00 around the world should really realize 7:03 that the Islamic movement that wants 7:08 peace without violence is not, uh, 7:10 restoring peace through strength, right 7:13 ? 7:15 >> It's not about peace based on strength, 7:17 based on violence. This is, 7:20 >> uh, peace based on agreement, peace 7:22 based on gentleness, 7:24 >> peace based on mutual trust. That's a 7:27 different story. 7:30 >> So, if Islam takes peace with that 7:32 model, mutual respect, mutual 7:34 appreciation, uh, building equal 7:37 relationships 7:39 >> without having to impose their will, 7:42 without having to impose, uh, power and 7:45 violence that ultimately creates, 7:49 >> uh, uncertainty, creates an atmosphere 7:51 of life filled with, uh, oppression of 7:53 one another. Well, that's the 7:55 fundamental difference. Well, I think 7:58 the motive for the visit of the three 8:00 Mecca alliance countries to Iran is 8:02 like that. The motive is seeing an 8:05 extraordinary trend on the world stage. 8:08 Because it's proven that violence can 8:11 never guarantee the birth of peace. 8:14 Violence doesn't mean it will create 8:17 one, uh, eternal power. 8:21 >> Although everything is rotated like 8:24 that, 8:26 >> we need to know that power is useless 8:29 if it's not motivated by a desire 8:35 >> to do good deeds, to do good to one 8:38 another. Well, this isn't just a matter 8:43 of, in my view, it's not just about the 8:46 forces that will join the Mecca 8:48 alliance. 8:49 >> Yes. 8:50 >> But the Mecca alliance itself is part 8:52 of the SCO. 8:53 >> Oh, that's right. Correlation is 8:56 >> part of the Shanghai Cooperation 8:57 Organization. Huh. 8:58 >> Meanwhile, in the global construction, 9:01 >> uh, the Sang High Cooperation 9:02 Organization is 9:04 >> part of the bricks. 9:06 >> While the bricks are in a 9:08 >> head-to-head position facing what is 9:11 called the G7 or facing what is called 9:13 NATO. 9:15 >> So, from a security perspective, NATO, 9:17 from an economic perspective, it's 9:18 called the G7. That's what 9:22 >> you conveyed yesterday at the Sunda 9:23 Kelapa Mosque. 9:25 >> How do we view Iran? He, 9:28 >> as part of the SCO, as part of the 9:31 brakes, right? 9:32 >> What did you even calculate up to 2040 9:39 >> H, what 9:40 >> will it be like? In Ana's 2040 9:43 calculations, Iran is still able to 9:46 survive. 9:47 >> Wow. 9:49 >> Because, eh, Iran is not actually alone 9:52 . It's with Russia, 9:54 >> with China. 9:56 >> China. Well, those calculations show 9:59 that when someone rushes to declare ee 10:02 BP 10:05 >> bop as 10:07 >> something intelligent, right? There 10:09 were those 10:09 >> on TV, saying things like that. 10:16 >> Ah, that shows their ideology, the 10:19 dollar is now over 18, right? 10:23 >> Right. Well, eh, so again, if we have 10:27 different ideologies, we don't need to 10:29 debate. 10:30 >> Hm. Yes. 10:33 >> So, the most fundamental lesson is that 10:35 if we have different ideologies, we 10:36 don't need to debate. For example, the 10:39 annual debate in London about religion. 10:42 Hm. 10:43 >> eh, actually, eh, if the debate is 10:46 based on mutual victory or defeat, 10:51 >> it will be different if the debate is 10:53 based on right or wrong. Yes. 10:57 >> Well, we see it that way if we want to 11:00 take the story of ee intelligence. For 11:03 me, my motive is indeed the motive of 11:05 enlightening the public, the motive of 11:06 opening up 11:07 >> our understanding of true knowledge 11:10 >> with valid references. 11:12 >> He. 11:13 >> With references that are scientifically 11:15 valid. If we use religious language, 11:17 he's valid. Well, we see that. Well, 11:23 meanwhile, if we take the story of how 11:25 the situation is developing in 11:27 Indonesia, 11:30 >> with Bocelli still having a position on 11:32 stage. 11:33 >> Right. 11:36 >> That's because the kid is 11:40 >> grinning and cunning. Ana, ana, ana 11:46 translated the kid as a grinning kid 11:48 who is cunning. The correlation is 11:51 different, bro. But the minister's son 11:55 has resigned. The Minister of Hajj, it 11:58 seems, was reported this morning. Ee, 12:01 >> that's Bang Kana, if Ana saw 12:04 >> Heeh. 12:05 >> ee we protested vigorously against 12:08 >> dynastic politics in the Soeharto era, 12:11 right. 12:11 >> Heeh. We protested vigorously. 12:14 >> But in the reform era, we argued that 12:18 the dynasty is legitimate. How come? It 12:21 >> doesn't violate the constitution, they 12:23 say. That's that, that's that, 12:28 >> ee Pak Harto's argument when criticized 12:30 about his dynasty 12:32 >> was that argument. Right. Right. 12:34 >> And I heard that from two people 12:36 directly. He. 12:37 >> I didn't hear it from those two people, 12:39 meaning people who were truly authentic 12:41 in their dealings with Pak Harto. 12:43 >> He. 12:43 >> My son didn't violate the constitution. 12:45 They said I didn't violate the 12:46 constitution. 12:47 >> There's no constitution for ethics. 12:49 Well. Ah. If I'm no longer dealing with 12:52 politics, political ethics, I'm 12:54 >> dealing with political morals. He's 12:55 much higher. 12:57 >> That's right. 12:59 >> Because behind the morals, behind the 13:01 words political morals, there are 13:03 actually constitutional morals. This is 13:06 what the high-ranking officials are 13:07 actually violating. 13:09 >> Uh, those who are listening, listen 13:11 carefully, especially the officials who 13:13 are listening to this. Hm. 13:15 >> H. 13:17 >> Imagine when or think about when the 13:20 constitution states the blessing of 13:24 Almighty God's grace and driven by 13:27 noble desires. First, it means your 13:32 power is not simply generated from 13:35 fabricated numbers. 13:37 >> Huh. 13:39 >> Repeat, okay. H. 13:41 >> So, this blessing of Almighty God's 13:44 grace is in paragraph 3, paragraph 3. 13:46 That means the numbers obtained through 13:49 the vote are fabricated numbers. 13:53 >> Hm. 13:53 >> In fact, learning from the constitution 13:56 is based on constitutional morals, the 13:58 morals of the UNF 5 preamble, which 14:00 demonstrates God's destiny and God's 14:02 destiny. If someone has been appointed 14:06 as the leader of a country, a leader of 14:09 a 14:10 >> country based on teachings, then their 14:13 journey will lead there. That's the 14:17 code. 14:18 >> If the code is already established, 14:20 then the code is definitely going to 14:22 lead there, right? 14:23 >> Yes. Well, from that, the important 14:26 note is that he must be followed with 14:29 an attitude driven by noble desires, 14:32 not driven by the desires of those in 14:35 power, not driven by power, uh, powers 14:38 that engineer his presence as a leader. 14:42 >> For example, the Bocelli issue, 14:44 >> heeh, how they go to extremes to the 14:46 point of the term "smuggling articles" 14:48 being introduced, to the point of the 14:50 term "Constitutional Court 14:51 justification" being introduced. That 14:54 wasn't driven by noble desires. 14:57 Officials who allow their relatives to 14:59 become officials simply because they 15:00 are the ones who decide. What about C? 15:03 >> Yes. 15:04 >> Well, that wasn't driven by noble 15:07 desires. It was driven by personal 15:10 desires, driven by family desires, 15:12 driven by dynasty desires, driven by 15:15 the desires of their own group. 15:19 >> And it turns out the results are 15:21 unhealthy. Why did a council member say 15:23 , "Yes, MUI told me to take care of 15:26 others." This is Ahmad Soni again. This 15:29 is confusing, isn't it, his literacy. 15:32 >> Heeh. If a council member now speaks 15:35 nonsense, they are indeed a group of 15:37 nonsense. 15:41 >> So there's no need to agree or disagree 15:44 , 15:45 >> eh, when ah Doli Kurnia stated that the 15:49 >> article was being smuggled, a 15:51 >> meme appeared 15:53 >> circulating all over the place, the 15:54 content of which was 15:55 >> Bahlil reprimanding Doli Kurnia. How 15:59 can the 16:01 >> Bohir be angry, right? How can the 16:04 Bohir be angry? 16:06 >> So Bambang Pacul's statement really 16:08 proves that it depends on the general 16:11 chairman. What does the general 16:13 chairman want. From there, Tescandin 16:16 Nursi proves 16:17 >> that this country of 282 million people 16:20 is controlled by 29 people. 16:22 >> That's it. 16:25 >> From there, it's unhealthy. From there, 16:27 it's an oligarchy whose purpose is to 16:29 bring blessings and grace from Almighty 16:31 God. 16:33 >> An oligarchy whose purpose is to bring 16:35 is encouraged by the noble. 16:37 >> The oligarchy that should bring freedom 16:39 , independence, sovereignty, justice, 16:41 and 16:42 >> prosperity in order to achieve the 16:45 mission of 16:46 >> protecting 16:48 >> intelligence, welfare, and justice. Yes 16:52 , it was not achieved. He. 16:55 >> So the vision, mission, vision, mission 16:56 , foundation in the preamble were not 16:58 achieved, and the gap between the two 16:59 foundations is getting wider. That's 17:02 what we talked about maybe two months 17:04 ago as a constitutional gap. That's 17:07 what the 17:07 >> New York Times brought up. 17:10 >> Yes, that's the 17:11 >> problem of this time bomb. 17:13 >> There's a gap, 17:14 >> there's a gap between numbers and 17:16 reality. 17:17 >> If we're not just talking about numbers 17:19 and reality. There's a constitutional 17:21 gap. Between ideas and reality, it's 17:24 even worse. If the approach of numbers 17:29 and reality is a technocratic approach. 17:34 >> If Ihsanudin Nursi on radio Silaturahim 17:36 stated there was a constitutional gap, 17:38 that means there's a gap between the 17:40 constitution and reality. Oh, 17:44 >> so the fuse is the fuse to the 17:46 explosion, the 17:47 >> fuse to the 17:49 >> ee time bomb. 17:50 >> He. It's 17:51 >> been burning since Indonesia. If we 17:54 uncover Ihsanuddin Nursi's digital 17:56 footprint, 17:57 >> it will be visible. I've 18:00 >> said the fuse to the time bomb has been 18:03 lit. It's just a matter of whether the 18:05 burning speed will increase or the 18:07 burning speed will slow down. It 18:10 depends on the social, political, and 18:12 economic systems. 18:14 >> Well, foreigners assess two things. 18:16 MSCI assesses it like that, the New 18:17 York Times assesses it like that. We 18:19 have to know who is assessing this. 18:21 From here, we have to be fair. 18:22 >> Yes. 18:23 >> We have to be fair. 18:25 >> We have to be proportional. I said that 18:29 MSCI is a means to hinder or eliminate 18:33 Indonesia's participation in the 18:37 dedollarization and desuet strategy. 18:42 That's the 18:43 >> brick, right? 18:45 >> Okay, okay. You're participating in 18:46 Briaks, but what are you doing? 18:48 Following dedollarization, what are you 18:50 doing? Leaving behind something like 18:52 that, huh? He. 18:53 >> Okay. As for the New York Times, H 18:56 >> is part of conservative Jewry. 18:58 >> Hm. 18:59 >> This owner is conservative Jew. So you 19:01 know for yourself. 19:03 >> He. 19:04 >> So you know who the New York Times is. 19:05 And indeed, it's a reference for her. 19:08 Her is included there. Herdi. Hardi is 19:10 also included, right? Or what? 19:13 Including the Zionists, or 19:17 >> what? Jews in general. 19:20 >> Oh, Zionists. 19:21 >> Oh, Zionists. So if we take, if we take 19:24 , uh, how the New York Times reported 19:26 something like that. H 19:29 >> when China was attacked by its capital 19:31 market. So, 19:32 >> uh, I'll take the example of the most 19:35 devastating capital market attack in 19:37 the 21st century, the Shanghai capital 19:39 market attack on 19:42 >> August 24, 2015. As a result, China's 19:44 debt to America 19:47 >> decreased by 260 billion US dollars. 19:50 From 1.4 trillion US dollars in 19:53 Treasury Bills, it was 19:55 >> reduced to 1.14 trillion US dollars. 19:59 >> And today, China is the third country, 20:01 >> not the first country, to hold US 20:03 territorial bills because China shifted 20:05 its foreign exchange reserves 20:07 >> to become more 20:09 >> dominant in gold. So, 20:13 >> when we see the New York Times like 20:14 that, right? 20:15 >> He 20:16 >> is proof that the capital market attack 20:19 , the negative news about China, 20:23 >> I 20:23 >> campaigned by the Western media for 20:27 almost 15 years, 20:28 >> H 20:29 >> failed. 20:31 >> Yes. Now, if people go to America and 20:34 go to China, it's different. Many 20:37 people are poor, they say, in America. 20:39 In China, everyone is stable. How? Well 20:44 , that's what I said before. A number 20:47 of Indonesian economists have joined in 20:50 , eh parrots, 20:51 >> hm 20:53 >> intellectuals ee politics, Indonesian 20:55 economic intellectuals have become 20:57 parrots. When the media reports that 21:00 China will fall because of the property 21:02 crisis, China will fall because of the 21:03 crisis. It's become a total parrot. 21:07 Radio Silaturahim is a living witness. 21:09 Iksandrin Nursi said it won't be like 21:11 that. 21:14 >> Yes. Now, if we go into why, eh, 21:19 America is homeless while China 21:22 continues to build property for its 21:25 poor? Why can the Chinese people dare 21:29 to be creative 21:30 >> to support themselves? Because the 21:32 state supports their creativity. 21:34 >> America has nothing to do with that. 21:36 Yes. 21:37 >> America doesn't provide affordable 21:39 housing. America doesn't support 21:41 funding for creative communities. 21:43 Meanwhile, 21:45 >> there's Zohran, so it's a strange item 21:47 there, right? 21:48 >> Yes. Zahran's stuff is strange stuff 21:51 like that. Well, from that, we can see 21:54 that gold is actually showing the 21:57 system 21:59 >> that a system that always gives birth 22:01 to sects is a system based on 22:03 individual materialism that is bound to 22:06 fall apart. That's what 22:08 >> we're actually being shown. What I'm 22:10 surprised about is a number of 22:11 intellectuals in Indonesia, I'm really 22:14 surprised. 22:16 >> Eh, it means sometimes they've reached 22:18 a point of soru, this 22:21 >> irony, 22:22 >> irony. Poor naivety, huh? 22:26 >> Yes, you're really naive. I've been 22:30 given examples like that, but I still 22:33 want to follow the American liberal 22:35 style. I want to follow the American 22:36 democratic style. Democracy. 22:38 >> Eh, democracy has become a religion. 22:41 Even a number of high-ranking officials 22:43 in this country firmly stated that 22:45 democracy is extraordinary. He doesn't 22:48 know that democracy, in American 22:50 studies, is a tool for oppression. Can 22:53 you 22:53 >> imagine? 22:57 >> Yes, this kind of representation, in 22:58 fact, this country already has 22:59 representation. There already is, if 23:02 there, it's the wal fakih or something 23:04 like that, right? If it were 23:07 functioning, that's our original 23:08 constitution, right, Bro. 23:10 >> Well, it was changed by intellectuals 23:13 in 2002. 23:16 >> So there's a bohir. While the waliul 23:19 fiqh in Iran are only filled with ulama 23:21 . 23:22 >> In Indonesia, what is 23:24 >> controlled are indeed 23:25 >> intelligent, intellectual, and wise 23:29 people. He. 23:30 >> So there are four requirements to sit 23:33 in the MPR. 23:34 >> He must be intelligent, intellectual, 23:36 wise, and prudent in carrying out the 23:39 mandate of a 23:40 >> much better nation and state. So, there 23:42 are five requirements: intelligent, 23:45 intellectual, wise, wise, and fully 23:47 committed to carrying out the mandate 23:50 >> in order to fulfill the call of the 23:52 >> constitution. Well, that's why 23:55 >> when we talk about the constitutional 23:57 gap, we're actually experiencing a 23:59 political crisis, an 24:01 >> implementation crisis, or more 24:02 precisely, a governance crisis. Let's 24:05 >> repeat. A governance crisis. Why? 24:08 Because people implement it based on 24:10 their own desires, not the will of the 24:12 constitution. 24:13 >> The constitution can be twisted; just 24:14 make a new law and it's finished, 24:16 that's the story. That's 24:20 >> why when I was being nosy with words, 24:22 trying to find a reference to the 24:24 constitution by the MBG? Wow, they 24:27 searched and found Article 34. 24:29 >> They forgot that Article 34, when used 24:31 in a constitutional system, is what is 24:33 called a constitutional buffer. 24:36 >> Hmm, a buffer constitution. 24:38 >> So there are three other tools. There's 24:42 a basic buffer, 24:44 >> this, this, this, there's a basic 24:46 buffer, right? There's a main buffer, 24:49 and there's a supplementary buffer. 24:51 Then, fourthly, there's the buffer. 24:53 When the basic buffer, the main buffer, 24:56 what baser? The complement doesn't meet 24:58 the results. Then we find Article 34, 25:00 which states that the poor and 25:01 neglected children are cared for by the 25:03 state and then given to them. What does 25:05 that mean? It means first properly 25:06 implementing the constitution, which is 25:07 the main, the main, and the 25:08 complementary. The buffer is in case of 25:13 failure. Hmm. It must be prepared. 25:20 That's what's called constitutional 25:21 resilience. The spring of the 25:24 constitution is there. Aren't the 25:26 founders of the republic great? 25:28 >> They created a spring system when the 25:31 basic norms failed to be implemented. 25:35 >> He created the spring. The spring is 25:37 Article 34. So that this nation remains 25:39 unoppressed. So that this nation isn't 25:42 humiliated. So that this nation isn't 25:44 stupid. 25:45 >> Hm. That's 25:47 >> really great when I think about it like 25:49 that. 25:50 >> Yes. To the point where it's confusing 25:53 to differentiate between corruption and 25:55 bribery, this country needs someone to 25:57 direct it like that. That's the 26:00 headache, right, Bang. It's because 26:03 there's dishonesty and greed. 26:05 >> Hm. The 26:06 >> background is also a fear. If one day 26:10 the corruption is discovered. 26:11 >> W. 26:14 >> Then the meaning of state loss is 26:16 changed. It's changed. Well, it's clear 26:19 if you want to go back to that, right? 26:21 The definition of state loss. 26:23 >> He. 26:24 >> State loss is related to what is called 26:27 abuse of authority. 26:29 >> Yes, of course. If we use pagan 26:30 language, it's abuse of power. 26:33 >> If the state's financial loss is 26:37 >> based on grace and is against the law. 26:41 >> Well, abuse of power can cause state 26:44 losses 26:46 >> from a material and immaterial 26:48 perspective. 26:50 >> Hm. 26:51 >> If the loss is immaterial, it is 26:52 regulated by the constitution through 26:54 Article 7A. That's what applies to 26:57 Boceli. 26:58 >> Wow. A sly, grinning kid like that. 27:08 That's how it has 27:08 >> to be seen. So if we go back to the 27:11 international level, for example. 27:13 >> Hm. 27:14 >> Uh, for example, I read this, uh, what 27:17 I read last night, huh. Hehe. Oh. 27:20 >> How uh, uh, Trump is 27:24 >> also sought after by Republicans 27:26 because he provides a unique 27:28 understanding 27:29 >> that is different from other American 27:31 presidents in the last 40 years. W, 27:33 that's the comparison. In the last 40 27:36 years, Trump's Trumpism. Trumpism 27:42 >> has given rise to the idea that America 27:45 must always be the primary nation, and 27:48 that is what then gave almost all 27:50 Americans the idea that the American 27:52 people are primary throughout the 27:55 country, throughout the international 27:57 world. Wow, that's the kind of thinking 28:00 . That's what inspires enthusiasm. Well 28:02 , from that perspective, 28:06 >> from that perspective, Trump has 28:08 succeeded in instilling a sense of 28:10 pride in the American people that they 28:13 are a great nation, a primary nation, a 28:16 foremost nation. 28:18 >> Primus interpares, in simple terms. 28:20 >> He, 28:21 >> back in Hitler's time, it was called 28:23 primus interpares, 28:24 >> the primary of the first. Arya 28:28 >> primus interpares. Yes, that's right. 28:30 Arya, that's how it looks. He. 28:32 >> Well, that's 28:33 >> acknowledged, but at the same time, it 28:36 turns out that the costs are too high 28:39 for that. That was rejected. 28:40 >> Huh, uh, 28:42 >> uh, the costs that they incur, so they 28:44 not only come up with ideas, uh, 28:46 appreciate one idea, but they also 28:49 measure what can be used to achieve 28:51 that idea. 28:54 >> So, when we return to the Indonesian 28:56 situation, we have to assess it. For 28:59 example, I see that MSCI is right, 29:03 >> but it's also wrong. Which one is more 29:06 dominantly right or wrong? If we use 29:09 Isrudin Nursi's corporate versus state 29:11 theory, 29:12 >> corporations versus the state, then 29:14 corporations can't subjugate the state. 29:16 Again, 29:17 >> corporations can't subjugate and 29:19 conquer the state. It can't. When we 29:22 said earlier, we would create our own 29:24 index, 29:25 >> like the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, for 29:28 example, which still respects Indonesia 29:30 . 29:30 >> Well, that proves 29:33 >> that the FDSX 29:36 >> is Frankfurt, Germany. The 29:37 >> German capital market. 29:38 >> Oh, the 29:39 >> German capital market. Well, that means 29:41 it's actually uncomfortable living and 29:45 following the crypto movement 29:47 >> because crypto is only about the dollar 29:49 . 29:50 >> They say, "Why is crypto only about the 29:51 dollar? Why isn't there a European 29:54 Union currency?" 29:55 >> Why is the central bank movement, the 29:57 movement towards a central banking 29:59 digital currency, dominated by the 30:00 dollar? 30:02 >> They don't want that. So, behind FTX's 30:06 statement, there's actually a protest 30:08 from the European Union, 30:10 >> there's a protest from European 30:12 countries over the dollarization 30:13 movement. 30:15 >> At the same time, they don't want the 30:18 dollar being used as a tool for 30:20 sanctions, as a weapon for economic 30:22 punishment. Ah, that's what they see. 30:25 That's why it came out. So, 30:27 >> once again, Iksand Nursi's study found 30:29 evidence 30:31 >> that the FTSX's stance was actually 30:33 that it didn't want to follow what's 30:35 called dollarization. Why? Because they 30:39 saw it that way. 30:41 >> Yes, yes, yes, I understand. So why? 30:43 >> So, 30:44 >> I continued, 30:46 >> meaning, when we see a message conveyed 30:48 by the FTF's position, we should look 30:51 not only at the position of stock 30:52 buying and selling transactions, 30:56 >> but also at the connection to the 30:57 exchange rate. The exchange rate, in 31:00 monetary theory, is related to 31:03 >> interest rates and inflation. It's 31:05 >> determined by the central bank. Well, 31:07 they're well aware that the US central 31:10 bank can just print dollars at will. 31:16 Yes. That's how 31:17 >> I see it. So, when we come back, we 31:19 want to create our own index. Well, 31:21 here we are. 31:23 >> Hmm. 31:25 >> Remember when I stated in Rasil that 31:27 you don't need weapons to colonize 31:29 Indonesia? Remember? 31:31 >> Yes, that's right. Yes. 31:33 >> Okay. There are five conditions. There 31:35 are five conditions, and now the model 31:36 is like that. 31:37 >> Hmm. 31:38 >> Yes. The first condition is regulation, 31:41 right? He 31:42 >> standardization, 31:44 >> supervision, reputation, that's the 31:47 thing. 31:48 >> Well, and credibility is determined by 31:50 them. They determine regulations, they 31:54 determine standardization, they 31:56 determine reputation, they determine 31:58 supervision, they determine credibility 32:01 , through those measures, we see that 32:03 it's a 32:04 >> way to oppress Indonesia, a way to 32:06 subdue Indonesia without having to use 32:09 weapons, that's how to see it. He. 32:11 >> Ah, what's the measure? Let's go back 32:12 to the constitution. 32:14 >> Hm. 32:14 >> Because the preamble requires this 32:17 nation, right, to be 32:20 >> free from oppression, 32:23 >> free from ignorance, free from poverty, 32:25 free from inequality. Lastly, the most 32:29 important thing is 32:30 >> to be free from humiliation. 32:34 >> That's humiliation, our currency is 32:36 humiliation, this morning it's already 32:38 18,000 18190 like that. Well, 32:42 >> 18,200, if I was talking about 18190 32:44 yesterday, we said that 32:47 >> if we use Hatta's thesis, I'm 32:49 >> talking everywhere, 32:51 >> if we use Hatta's thesis, then 32:54 >> money is sovereignty. Oh, this was when 32:58 Hatta first 32:59 >> spoke about the rupiah. 33:01 >> Then Ihsanuddin Nursi stated that 33:04 >> its value, its price, the value of the 33:07 currency is the weight of sovereignty. 33:10 Our sovereignty usually declines. 33:13 >> Ahah. That's it. So if the value of the 33:17 currency is sovereignty, then its price 33:21 >> is the weight of sovereignty. 33:25 >> When it depreciates, plummets 33:27 drastically, then sovereignty also 33:29 declines, trust also declines, and 33:32 self-esteem also declines. That's where 33:37 red is sometimes thrown outside, seen 33:39 as ah, the rupiah cell, they say it's 33:43 >> trivial, right? 33:44 >> While there are neighboring countries 33:47 whose currency might circulate more in 33:49 Indonesia, it's funny. 33:51 >> Yes. Uh, that's because it's used as a 33:53 tool for corruption, that's 33:59 >> interesting there. So, if we realize, 34:02 >> eh, Hatta said, hee, 34:05 >> the value of money is sovereignty, 34:07 right? Currency, its price, ah, 34:10 currency is sovereignty, 34:12 >> its value is the weight of sovereignty, 34:14 right? If we take that. So, in fact, it 34:18 teaches about the importance of 34:21 building an economic system that 34:25 doesn't open itself up until, in 34:28 quotation marks, we are naked in the 34:32 eyes of foreigners. 34:35 >> Hm. 34:37 >> So, why is that naked? Because we 34:40 liberalize ourselves through the 34:42 so-called regulations they want, the 34:44 standardization they want, the 34:46 supervision they do, the reputation 34:49 they establish, the credibility they 34:51 claim, and so 34:53 >> on. So, who is 34:56 >> this Ihsanuddin Nursi? Oh, he doesn't 34:58 align with our way of thinking, so he's 35:00 not included in our reputation and 35:02 credibility. Let's repeat this, so it's 35:04 clear. He 35:05 >> can't be included in the checklist in 35:06 this danantara if this is the case. 35:08 >> It can't be. Because his way of 35:11 thinking is different from ours. 35:13 Different from the ideology we instill. 35:15 They say he's not included in our 35:17 reputation. He's 35:18 >> not botherable. He's not credible. 35:21 That's how he thinks. 35:24 >> This nation has been fed that way of 35:27 thinking. 35:28 >> Yes. Wow, X is great because he became 35:31 one of the top officials at the World 35:33 Bank. 35:35 >> He didn't know that the World Bank was 35:36 a tool of colonization, for example. 35:39 >> Yes, that's a phenomenon of thinking 35:41 whose narrative has been conditioned 35:43 for a long time, right? 35:46 >> Well, that conditioned narrative 35:48 sentence is part of what's called 35:49 symbolic violence. Language that seems 35:53 gentle but is actually oppressive. 35:55 >> Hm. The language seems gentle but is 35:58 oppressive. 36:00 >> In the past, debt was called aid, 36:02 assistance. That's right. AID. 36:04 >> Yes. Aid as assistance. 36:06 >> Okay. Then 36:09 >> the country that gives, the creditor 36:11 country is called a donor country. 36:13 >> Hm. Yes. What is the Netherlands? A 36:16 >> donor country. 36:17 >> Yes. He. A 36:17 >> donor country is very noble. Blood 36:20 donors. Crazy, isn't that sentence? 36:22 >> Oh, very noble. But they are not donors 36:25 . They are loan sharks. Wow, isn't that 36:28 cruel? That's 36:30 >> using a changed term. I 36:33 >> yes. How can you say loan sharks come, 36:35 don't donors come? 36:40 >> I remember very clearly how Kikiangi 36:41 was angry at the Neolip group. They 36:43 said, "The ones you trust are loan 36:45 sharks." They said the ones you respect 36:47 are loan sharks. I. Allah. 36:51 >> Okay. Let's continue now. If we look at 36:55 it that way on the international stage, 36:59 when we sit as a nation that truly 37:01 protects, preserves, and defends our 37:04 sovereignty in all aspects of life, 37:07 then we will certainly not accept the 37:10 dictates of outsiders. 37:14 >> Why? Because of the standards we 37:16 establish. Ah, here, standardization. 37:19 The standards we establish, the scales 37:21 we use are not based on Western 37:23 standards. Ah, 37:27 >> this enters into the position of what 37:30 we once said about the greatness of 37:32 secularism in Indonesia because they 37:35 built these standards and measures, so 37:37 that we entered the mindset of, "Okay, 37:40 the West has no problem and the West is 37:42 — 37:43 >> ah, this is the sentence of a 37:44 high-ranking official, this 37:46 >> is the best example in the context of 37:48 economic development." Wow, that's 37:49 >> amazing, right? 37:50 >> Yet China has demonstrated that since 37:53 1992. So in my notes, China has 37:57 demonstrated a development model 38:00 >> that is different from the Western way. 38:01 Of course, since 1992, 38:04 >> when Deng Xiaoping stated that, well, I 38:07 certainly don't use the cultural 38:09 revolution from the 1990s. 38:12 >> I just use Deng. Deng Xiaoping. When 38:14 Deng Shopping stated that 38:16 >> rare earth minerals are oil. 38:18 >> Oh, 38:19 >> you have oil. 38:20 >> We have 38:21 >> minerals. 38:22 >> America depends on that, right? Well. 38:26 Ah, that's about how visionary a leader 38:29 is. How a leader awakens something that 38:33 is valuable. What is valuable? Well, 38:37 here are five indicators. 38:38 >> Hmm. 38:39 >> The values do indeed bind all levels of 38:41 society. That's the first. 38:43 >> The second is demonstrated by its 38:45 leaders like Iran. 38:47 >> Hmm. You see. Iran shows its values 38:50 bind society and that is practiced by 38:52 its leaders because it creates examples 38:54 . 38:56 >> Because there are examples, it creates 38:58 pride. 38:59 >> Because there is pride, it creates 39:00 cooperation. Because there is 39:02 cooperation, they are difficult to 39:04 divide. And that's where 39:05 self-confidence arises. Ah, that's the 39:09 thinking, Boss. These people who are 39:15 listening have been quiet. 39:18 >> Hey, it's already 8:41, Bro. 39:21 >> But it's extraordinary. I didn't notice 39:23 it. Go ahead, Bro. Yes. 39:26 >> In closing, the New York Times report 39:32 stated that Indonesia is lighting a 39:34 time bomb that will explode one day. In 39:39 fact, the so-called conservative 39:41 Zionist group itself is announcing that 39:44 Indonesia has ignited a time bomb since 39:47 Indonesia declared its nation to 39:50 implement neoliberalism and liberal 39:53 democracy. That's 39:55 >> Exandrudin Nursi's statement. When the 40:00 world of social media hadn't yet 40:01 flourished. If you don't believe me, 40:03 look at print media. 40:05 >> Yes. H. Don't look at social media, 40:06 look at print media. When I was a 40:08 resource person, I firmly stated that 40:10 Indonesia was lighting the fuse of a 40:12 time bomb that would one day explode. 40:14 So I've been talking about more than a 40:16 generation of 40:17 >> steadfastness and a 40:18 >> new one. Yes, of course. I'll be 40:22 steadfast there. 40:26 >> So why? Because you're no longer there, 40:29 right? The verse is clear in Anisa. 40:32 >> What did Anisa firmly state? How can we 40:35 get 40:36 >> out of that verse like that, it's 40:38 impossible and it turns out that time 40:40 after time it proves that power, it 40:42 proves that the verse is empirically 40:44 proven, you know, that verse ee got 40:46 empirical evidence, it's as if the 40:48 verse goes behind the empirical goes 40:50 first, isn't it, 40:53 >> if in the Qur'an, that verse goes first 40:55 , empirically follows empiricism 40:57 follows like that here, ee, ladies and 40:59 gentlemen, listeners of Rasil, viewers 41:01 of Rasil TV, like that. Yes, again, in 41:05 my life experience story, it's proven 41:08 how strong the Qur'an is when held as 41:11 knowledge, held as faith. 41:14 >> Masyaallah. 41:15 >> How he gives guidance. 41:17 >> Guidance that enlightens, guidance that 41:20 broadens. Guidance that calms. Repeat. 41:24 Guidance that broadens. 41:25 >> Hm. 41:26 >> Guidance that enlightens, guidance that 41:28 calms. sakinah, mawadah warahmah is not 41:31 only in the perspective of married life 41:34 , but also life in a household and 41:36 state. Ah, that sentence is 41:38 >> important. 41:39 >> So, when it is said that there is 41:41 sakinah, mawadah, warahmah, it does not 41:43 only apply to the family, it also 41:45 applies to the country. Why? Because we 41:48 are nafsul mutmainah. Uh, masyaallah. 41:52 That is if we can think like that, 41:53 without having to harm those who are 41:55 not of the same religion as us, who do 41:57 not share our faith, without having to 41:59 belittle, criticize, insult, curse, 42:01 demean or even become hostile. We are 42:04 not like that. 42:05 >> H 42:06 >> ummahan wahidah, one ummah that does 42:08 not hostility, does not belittle, does 42:10 not criticize, does not want, does not 42:12 insult our brothers who do not share 42:14 our faith, but instead we respect and 42:16 appreciate them in their place, in 42:18 their portion. That's how it is to 42:20 think. Masyaallah. Subhanakalamualaikum 42:31 warahmatullahi wabarakatuh. Alam 42:33 warahmatullahi wabarakatuh. 
