Transkrip diambil dari YouTube. Klik timestamp biru untuk melompat ke posisi tersebut di pemutar.
0:08 Brail TV. 0:16 Peace be upon you, and Allah's mercy 0:18 and blessings. How are you, Bang 0:20 Ihsanuddin Nursi? 0:22 And peace be upon you too, and Allah's 0:24 mercy and blessings. Mashallah. It's 0:29 certainly hot today, isn't it? When 0:32 it's hot, there are many shadows. Now, 0:34 there is a shadow cabinet. Now there is 0:37 a shadow parliament. So, Bang 0:39 Ihsanuddin Nursi, have you become a 0:41 shadow minister or what, Bang? Is there 0:44 some talk here from friends who seem to 0:47 be scratching their heads looking at 0:49 this extraordinary constitution? Not to 0:53 mention the state policy guidelines. It 0:55 feels a bit delusional, because all 0:57 this time, there haven't been any state 0:58 policy guidelines. How do you see it, 1:00 Bang Ihsanuddin Nursi, regarding this 1:02 story of state policy guidelines? Why 1:05 only now, after being awaited for years 1:08 , what is this all about? Maybe it's 1:12 also a story that can, uh, 1:14 constitutionally speaking, why did the 1:17 MPR go to the President to present it? 1:21 Well, maybe Bang Ihsan could explain 1:23 that, or maybe not yet. Not to mention 1:25 global issues that seem extraordinary, 1:28 the developments in the Middle East and 1:31 also in America, uh, serve as a 1:33 temptation that we cannot ignore, those 1:36 news reports from abroad. What is 1:39 happening with Saudi Arabia and its 1:41 love for nuclear power? After all, Iran 1:43 has already offered, Russia too, and 1:45 Pakistan as well. Why did Trump impose 1:47 conditions, like, uh, the Abraham 1:49 Accords must be included if they want 1:51 nuclear power, and the Israel card has 1:53 become part of the story? Meanwhile, 1:56 Iran denies Trump's claim that they 1:58 were begging to negotiate. Peace. Wow, 2:01 has America run out of steam? It seems 2:04 the budget in America is 2:05 extraordinarily huge. The listeners 2:08 also want to hear the story of what, 2:10 exactly? Hmm, the AI audit system. Bang 2:14 Ihsanuddin often reminds us not to 2:17 ignore artificial intelligence. Will it 2:20 help, or can it still be manipulated 2:22 further? Please go ahead, Bang, maybe 2:25 there are other stories you'd like to 2:27 share; we don't close the opportunity 2:28 for discussion. Let's provide 2:31 enlightenment for the listeners from 2:33 Aceh to Banyuwangi, and at least in 34 2:36 countries. Even if there are only one 2:39 or two, or dozens, or hundreds of 2:41 listeners in the United States. Please, 2:44 Bang Ihsan. 2:48 I will start with the situation in the 2:50 Middle East. 2:52 Because yesterday there was a lively 2:55 discussion 2:56 uh 2:57 at the UIN Syarif Hidayatullah. 2:59 Oh, I see. Yes. 3:00 About the Islamic Republic of Iran. Was 3:04 the book launched there? 3:07 And it was discussed extensively; they 3:10 called it proof that the Islamic 3:13 Republic of Iran is proof of resilience 3:17 . 3:17 H 3:18 The resilience of an Islamic-based 3:20 state, that was the point of the book. 3:23 That's more or less it. 3:25 From there, I want to look at how Iran 3:32 is the only Islamic country that 3:37 hinders Israel's movement in 3:42 secularizing the Middle East. 3:48 Hmm. 3:48 There is only one left, it really is 3:51 only Iran. H 3:54 Because all Middle Eastern countries 3:56 have been successfully secularized. 3:58 H 3:59 Even if you use religious attire, there 4:02 is sacred land, two sacred lands there. 4:06 But please, just go ahead and worship 4:08 and do good deeds. But don't ever talk 4:11 about the political system, don't ever 4:13 talk about the economic system, 4:15 don't ever talk about the legal system, 4:17 don't ever talk about the civilization 4:19 system. H 4:21 That is why Rasil firmly declares an 4:24 Iran war. Rasil with 4:26 with guest Iandi Mursi. 4:28 H 4:29 Rasil, with guest Mursi, states that 4:31 the Iran war is a war of civilizations. 4:34 The Iran war is a religious war. We 4:37 have been saying that from the very 4:39 beginning. Even if people are only 4:41 saying it now, saying it late, that is 4:43 fine. It is good too. It means there is 4:45 awareness among people talking about it 4:47 . Yeah. 4:48 Now, from there, all American proxies 4:51 will certainly be strengthened to fight 4:54 Iraq. All American proxies. 4:57 Hm. 4:58 So, the American proxies, indicated by 5:00 the presence of military bases in those 5:02 respective countries, will be 5:04 strengthened. That is why Trump is 5:06 promising nuclear weapons. 5:09 Trump is promising nuclear weapons 5:11 intended to strengthen proxy countries, 5:14 secular countries. Let’s just speak 5:16 openly about this, is that okay? No, 5:17 that’s fine. Times are like this, man 5:20 . He he. Ah, like that, let's just 5:22 speak openly. So, we are not talking 5:24 behind anyone's back. Speaking directly 5:26 and openly in front, like that, okay. 5:29 Proxy countries as representatives of 5:31 the secular system are being 5:33 strengthened with nuclear weapons. At 5:37 the same time, the country with the 5:40 most nuclear warheads is running out of 5:43 missiles. 5:44 Yeah. Their reserves are running thin, 5:46 at the very least. True. True. They are 5:48 buying more. 5:49 Thus, Trump's policy was released, 5:52 the PBX policy was released, 5:54 10 billion US dollars, 5:56 to accelerate procurement. Ah, this is 5:59 the sentence. to accelerate missile 6:01 procurement, 6:03 to procure that, and it is being 6:05 tendered, and if we read it in, 6:07 he 6:08 on the Department of War's website, 6:10 and then we read it on the White House 6:12 website, you know, 6:14 it is visible. 6:15 even though he then acknowledges, 6:18 regarding the various successes, 6:20 well, you know, executive campaigns are 6:22 usually like that, right? 6:25 But at least with 6:27 with the accelerated missile 6:30 procurement tender, it proves that, his 6:37 reserves are completely drained. So it 6:40 is not that it was prepared for war, 6:42 the reserves themselves are simply 6:44 drained. 6:45 That seems to be Iran's successful 6:46 strategy, it appears. 6:49 And there, a major problem arises in 6:51 the eyes of NATO, the NATO members 6:52 themselves, you know. 6:54 How can they defend? 6:57 That. So the policy I mentioned earlier 7:02 on July 7-8 was released. 7:03 H 7:05 a policy stating all NATO members must 7:08 spend 5%, which we also discussed 7:10 previously long before others talked 7:12 about it. 7:14 And NATO just discussed that on July 7:16 7-8 in 7:17 in Ankara, Turkey. 7:18 Now, 7:20 from there, we can see that they also 7:23 have to build a perception. They also 7:26 have to build a perception based on a 7:29 narrative, of course, 7:31 that their enemy is struggling, because 7:33 they themselves are struggling. There 7:37 are always hoaxes, they have to be 7:38 flipped. 7:39 Yeah. 7:40 Yes, they usually employ deception 7:42 patterns, right? 7:43 I 7:44 The act of inversion is common, 7:47 Zionists do that kind of inversion, so 7:49 they flip it to say that the enemy is 7:52 struggling and under pressure. So he 7:56 says 7:56 so they beg us to make peace again. 8:01 That is what you call a deception 8:03 pattern. Uh-huh. That’s how it should 8:05 be read, how to look at it, the 8:07 perspective. 8:08 Yes. 8:09 Now, what's interesting is, he is also 8:12 helping Japan. 8:14 Hm. 8:16 This Washington is helping Tokyo. 8:18 Uh-huh. 8:19 Because its value collapsed completely, 8:21 by billions of dollars, he is helping 8:23 to prevent its value from falling. Wow, 8:26 that's something, right? Uh-huh. 8:28 So it means Washington's pressure, but 8:29 of course because they are free to 8:31 print money, they just do whatever they 8:32 want. That's it. 8:36 Yes. That's why if we look at this war, 8:40 besides it being a war of civilizations 8:42 or a religious war, you know. H. 8:46 This is what I call it, in my words, uh 8:50 . 8:52 Financial, digital, military industrial 8:55 complex. So if you ask AI at the end, 8:59 eh, this is a foreign term, says the AI 9:02 . But when I say this term, this is 9:06 Iksanuddin Nursi's term, then it 9:08 explains it deeper. So if you use Chat 9:11 GPT, 9:12 and ask what FDMIC is, you know. 9:15 Uh-huh. 9:16 It says this is a foreign term, a term 9:18 not yet known to the public, it says. 9:21 Yes. But the industry uses FDMIC, 9:24 uh, financial, digital, military 9:26 industrial complex. Uh-huh. 9:28 Because both the financial and military 9:31 sectors, in the form of a complex as an 9:33 industry—financial industry, military 9:35 industry, and the digital industry— 9:37 are indeed locked by digital issues. 9:43 That is where, as we always say, the 9:46 world now cannot avoid AI, but AI is 9:50 just instrumentation for speed, 9:53 precision, quality, and work 9:56 productivity. That's the phrasing. So 9:59 if you use their language, 10:01 AI is in the context of faster, cheaper 10:05 , better, uh, 10:07 greater is in the context of being 10:10 faster, cheaper, better, and broader in 10:13 its scope. That's what BPK uses. China 10:17 was ahead, 10:19 and then it was, 10:21 and it's proven today, there's news, 10:25 China's capabilities are increasingly 10:28 rising to help Iran, that is actually, 10:31 yes, behind all this there is a story 10:33 behind the story, isn't it, Bang, after 10:36 Pakistan previously. 10:39 After Pakistan, now it's things, 10:42 Chinese goods playing in, in, 10:45 in Iran, along with Iran's preparations 10:47 which indeed have prepared from way 10:49 back. That's how it is, Bang. 10:51 That's it. Now, this cannot be 10:53 separated from the battle, you know, 10:55 the battle between Republicans and 10:57 Democrats. Not exactly a battle, 10:59 h. 10:59 A contest between Republicans and 11:01 Democrats in playing fossil fuels 11:03 against renewable energy. I just 11:05 mentioned it yesterday, 11:07 last week in, in Purwokerto, you know. 11:10 Yes. So it is still a contest between 11:13 fossils and renewables. Because once 11:16 they play with fossils and renewables 11:19 and the power of fossils and... 11:22 The listeners want clarification on 11:23 what fossils are, what renewable energy 11:25 is. Not all listeners, Bang. 11:27 Okay, okay, okay. I forgot, I forgot. 11:30 Fossils are, 11:33 fossil-based energy fuels from natural 11:36 resources. For example, 11:39 oil, coal, for instance, you know. 11:42 Natural gas, those are the examples. 11:45 uh that is taken from its name nature 11:48 from other than digging uh the earth. 11:51 Meanwhile, new renewable energy 11:54 that is for example waste 11:56 sun. 11:58 Uh that is for example waste, sun, wind 12:01 , ocean waves. 12:02 Does palm oil count, brother? Oh, palm 12:05 oil is included. Palm oil is included. 12:09 That is why they determined it that way 12:10 , right. 12:11 Yes. 12:12 Abbreviated as NRE new renewable energy 12:14 using the language 12:16 the infidel language renewable energy, 12:18 like that. 12:18 Well, like that. 12:20 Well. Well. But if we look behind 12:23 fossil and NRE there is still a 12:25 technology issue. 12:26 Hm. 12:27 Well, found it here. He. 12:31 So if today they state solar power 12:34 plants or they shorten it, yeah waste 12:37 or solar I don't know, anyway it's 12:39 called PLTS 100 GW, right? 12:43 not 70 gig anymore, this is 100 GW 12:45 already. 12:47 100. 12:48 it's powerful, isn't it, in the energy 12:50 transition apparatus. 12:51 project project this project. 12:55 true. 12:56 it has reached that point. Well, but 12:58 don't get it wrong. 12:59 He. 13:00 There are three problems inside it. 13:03 One, 13:05 that means you will make foreign 13:07 investments or you will take on foreign 13:10 debt. 13:11 One, yes. One. 13:14 What's the point? Exchange rate. What's 13:17 the point? Well, that means we need 13:21 foreign currency if it's like that. 13:25 What does it mean? Exploitation occurs. 13:28 If ambitious, ah the proof is yesterday 13:30 in June we had to uh throw all the 13:32 profits of those foreign companies out 13:34 so we needed more dollars, so the 13:35 rupiah fell, right. That's one. 13:39 one one problem. The second problem 13:42 I call it technology dependency. 13:47 Dependency. So first was the exchange 13:50 rate, the second was the position of 13:52 technology dependency, the third is the 13:55 most interesting. 13:58 that means you still have to shop, 14:00 right, shop for all the... 14:03 uh raw materials and raw materials and 14:06 auxiliary materials 14:07 h 14:08 to produce that. Meaning we still need 14:11 to import various things. Well, one of 14:14 them, if it's a power plant, for 14:16 example, we have to buy photovoltaics 14:17 from which currently uh the masters are 14:19 among others China although Germany 14:21 also makes them, right. 14:23 Because Germany was the one who started 14:24 it first for solar power plants, 14:26 Germany was the one who started it. 14:28 but now the master of solar power users 14:31 is China. Meaning when we see that 14:35 battle happening, 14:38 again Indonesia enters what I call 14:40 getting trapped on the wrong path, 14:43 right. Repeat, trapped on the wrong 14:46 path. 14:47 China's nickel is from Indonesia, this 14:49 is extraordinary, isn't it. 14:52 Actually, it's not just the nickel. 14:55 but how the raw material for 14:57 photovoltaics is taken from raw 14:58 materials in Indonesia. 15:00 Great. Hm. He. 15:03 One of them is like that. 15:04 Extraordinary. 15:05 Japan is also like that. 15:06 Yes. They are extraordinary. Well, from 15:08 there, right. 15:10 when we enter the arena, any human in 15:13 the world, any human, they need energy, 15:17 right? 15:18 they need electricity, at least they 15:20 need electricity. 15:21 Especially now if my lecture yesterday. 15:24 uh gasoline-based cars will be reduced 15:27 drastically by 2035 or 2040. Hm 15:31 even motorcycles by 2040 will be fully 15:35 electric. and 15:38 it will be like that; in China, it's 15:40 already happening now, look for 15:41 vehicles, almost all of them are 15:43 electric, while here we are still 15:45 in the process 15:48 because indeed China is the largest 15:50 electric car manufacturer in the world, 15:52 beating Tesla, so internally they have 15:54 gone all-in on electricity. 15:56 that is actually in order to reduce its 15:58 dependency on 16:00 Hm. Yeah. 16:00 fossil energy. So when they help Iran, 16:04 they are actually still trying to 16:06 ensure that a number of their power 16:08 plants remain running based on fossil 16:11 energy. 16:12 Now, but Japan doesn't want to go that 16:14 route. 16:15 Japan does not make electric vehicles, 16:18 doesn't make electric cars. 16:19 Yes. Japan doesn't make them, Japan. 16:23 This is also why they make cars that 16:26 are, sort of, a mix between electric 16:29 and engine, right? What is the reason, 16:32 Bang? 16:33 Uh, Japan makes them, uh, hybrid. 16:36 Hybrid. 16:36 Electric cars mixed with conventional 16:38 cars, that's hybrid; they make those, 16:39 but they don't want to go fully 16:40 electric. Now, why don't they want to? 16:43 Because they know 16:44 the market leader is China. Oh, 16:47 meanwhile, China, with their fossil 16:50 fuel cars—let me repeat— 16:53 meanwhile, China, with just their 16:55 fossil fuel cars—I shouldn't mention 16:56 the names or it will be an 16:58 advertisement, an advertisement. 16:59 Regarding 17:02 their fossil fuel cars alone, they have 17:04 already beaten Japanese cars. 17:06 True. 17:07 The features inside, the quality of the 17:09 engine, the quality of the suspension. 17:11 If we ride in a Japanese car, the 17:13 suspension quality is like riding a 17:14 cart. Bumping and clattering around. 17:17 Right. 17:17 Yes. Not yet. 17:18 If you ride in a Chinese car, yes, 17:21 if you ride in a Chinese car, the 17:22 suspension is American-standard or 17:24 European-standard. 17:26 Uh, they adopted the technology, I mean 17:29 . 17:29 So that is how it ended up. Now, that 17:31 is how the battle has become. Now, 17:34 when it's like that, this war is 17:37 actually what I call no longer a 17:40 military war. 17:42 Hm. 17:42 That's it. No longer a war of weapons. 17:46 But a war that, in my lectures at Rasil 17:50 , I call a totality war. Remember when 17:54 I said this is a totality war, a total 17:57 war. 17:57 True, it's truly comprehensive, 17:59 including, yes, 18:00 true. 18:01 Through drugs, through LGBT, through 18:05 what, corruption, through all sorts of 18:07 things, right? That is actually part of 18:09 the war. Hm. 18:11 Yes, part of the war. 18:13 Exactly. Now, that is what I conveyed 18:15 at Rasil and in various places, in 18:17 dozens of places, over ten other places 18:18 . 18:19 Hm. 18:20 From all that warfare, it certainly 18:22 creates uncertainty. 18:25 That is what is called zulumat, 18:27 darkness, 18:29 uncertainty. So if the understanding of 18:32 zulumat is just darkness, actually in 18:33 everyday language, it is uncertainty. 18:36 Hm. 18:37 Now, if we use that terminology, the 18:40 diction, using the terminology using 18:43 the diction of darkness, uncertainty, 18:46 right? That actually already happened 18:48 when Ronald Reagan and Margaret 18:53 Thatcher birthed the neoliberal system 18:55 called the Washington Consensus. so 19:00 that even in the Soeharto era, the term 19:02 'a cloud of uncertainty is still 19:03 hanging' was born, the cool term for it 19:06 . 19:08 Yes. It's been years, so we need some 19:11 guiding principles to know which 19:13 direction we're headed. So we're 19:17 confused about where we're going. 19:19 Well, back in the Soeharto era, there 19:21 was the GBHN. 19:23 Yeah, every 5 years there was a 19:24 Repelita, this and that, you know, 19:26 those were the targets. Even though in 19:28 the Soeharto era there was the GBHN. 19:30 The GBHN was translated into the 19:32 Repelita. 19:33 The Repelita was translated into the 19:34 Pelita. The Pelita was translated into 19:36 the state budget. Like that. So the 19:39 sequence goes like that. 19:41 There's the GBHN, there's the Repelita, 19:44 there's the Pelita, and there's the 19:45 state budget. 19:47 Pelita is a 5-year development plan, 19:48 that’s what it means. 19:49 Hm. Correct. Why did those things 19:51 disappear? Why did it go back to this? 19:53 Go on. When what's his name appears 19:56 hmm 19:57 shadow government, 19:59 h 19:59 shadow parliament, 20:00 h 20:01 PPHN, 20:02 H 20:03 actually, the acknowledgment is that it 20:07 is 20:08 an admission of the failure of the 1945 20:12 Constitution, which was amended four 20:16 times. That's the key point. Yes. 20:20 Meaning, they failed. 20:22 Hm. Because the RPJMN 20:26 that has been created since the era 20:32 up until now 20:34 is essentially the subjective desire of 20:37 the rulers and not necessarily the 20:40 objective need of the public. Ah, 20:45 repeat, repeat the sentence. Repeat the 20:47 sentence. The RPJMN is essentially the 20:52 subjective desire of the rulers and not 20:55 necessarily the objective need of the 20:58 Indonesian people. 21:01 These rulers, these rulers are party 21:03 leaders and a few of their executives, 21:04 like that. 21:06 29 humans, Tursi said it, 29 humans. 21:13 29 humans. Who are those humans? He. 21:16 9 to 10 that are called political 21:18 parties 21:19 like a supreme judge, right? 21:21 It’s 9 plus 18, right? 21:24 Yes. 21:25 Yes, of course. So nine political 21:28 parties, supreme judges, and the 21:32 oligarchs. 21:34 27, it's 27 or 28, right? Already add 21:38 one, add one more. 21:39 He. 21:40 Like that, the president. 21:43 It adds up to 29. Now. Now, if we look 21:47 at that kind of story, that there's a 21:50 shadow parliament, shadow government, 21:53 and then the term PPHN appears, 21:56 PPHN, 21:58 then essentially, besides describing 22:00 the failure of the constitution, it's 22:03 proof that someone is maintaining the 22:05 misdirection. 22:12 Why? Because they say, "We want to 22:15 reclaim sovereignty." Well, if you want 22:18 to reclaim sovereignty, the 2002 22:21 Constitution surrendered sovereignty to 22:23 political parties. Only political 22:26 parties exercise the people's 22:28 sovereignty. The people no longer have 22:29 the right to sovereignty. How so? 22:32 How? Try to explain the logic of that. 22:35 He. Yeah. 22:36 That means they aren't talking about 22:37 the system. "We want to uphold 22:40 sovereignty based on the constitution." 22:42 Based on the constitution, the people's 22:44 sovereignty is surrendered to political 22:45 parties. So what? What are you trying 22:47 to say? 22:47 Isn't it possible to uphold 22:50 hasn't the Gerindra party already 22:53 written in their blueprint to carry out 22:55 this change? But how, man? So if we go 23:00 back to Gerindra, 23:02 Gerindra stated in their articles of 23:04 association, article 11, he, 23:06 that they want to uphold the 1945 23:08 Constitution and Pancasila. I don't 23:11 know why now they're only talking about 23:13 PPHN. 23:14 Hm. 23:16 Even though PPHN is 23:17 maybe they're eating porridge by the 23:19 riverbank, man. Let's think positively. 23:21 Uh, if we talk about PPHN, right. 23:24 Yeah. It has to change the law on the 23:27 hierarchy of legislation. 23:29 Why? Because the MPR no longer has the 23:31 right to issue decrees. 23:33 Oh, no wonder they meet with the 23:35 president like that. 23:37 Well, they hand it over to the 23:39 President to be adjusted to the 23:41 objective desire 23:42 from the subjective desire of the 23:44 executive branch. Then later, if they 23:48 establish national guidelines, 23:52 they set it as an MPR product, then 23:54 they must change the hierarchy of 23:56 legislation law so that the MPR again 23:58 has the right to issue decrees. 24:01 Hm. 24:03 If they still state that the PPHN is an 24:05 RPJP, then they have to see to what 24:07 extent the long-term development plan 24:09 fits with the PPHN. 24:12 Hm. Meaning that, in reality, the 24:15 president's subjectivity remains high, 24:17 yeah. 24:17 The ruler's subjectivity remains high, 24:19 that's how it's seen. So, why do we 24:21 connect it to the international world? 24:25 Because in essence, the 1945 24:29 Constitution is a declaration of 24:31 resistance against the secular system. 24:33 Ha, there is Pancasila, but it's just 24:39 going everywhere. saying it goes 24:43 everywhere is secular, that is a 24:49 betrayal. 24:51 even though the Muslim community has 24:52 already been tolerant 24:54 by removing the seven key words. 24:57 by removing, uh, the president is an 24:59 indigenous Indonesian who is a Muslim, 25:01 the "Muslim" part was discarded. 25:04 with the obligation to carry out sharia 25:05 for its adherents being discarded, 25:07 like that, we have already been 25:09 tolerant. 25:11 meaning, we truly acknowledge that 25:13 Indonesia is not a religious state, but 25:16 a state with religion, that is the 25:18 important sentence. Now, when it is 25:21 declared as religious, all decisions 25:23 must not contain secular elements. That 25:26 is the importance of 25:27 he 25:28 Western interests. Repeat. 25:30 Yes. 25:31 Western interests, specifically 25:33 Washington's interests, to change the 25:34 1945 Constitution. So if there are 25:39 clerics who don't understand that, 25:41 don't talk carelessly. H 25:44 look, I'm talking about reality here. I 25:46 , for example, yesterday there was an 25:48 Indonesian Muslim community congress, 25:51 it was held boisterously in a luxurious 25:53 place. 25:55 Let's see, did it have any echo? 25:57 Well, there were some minor tax issues, 26:00 but it was just swallowed by the wind. 26:03 The tax people said we aren't thinking 26:05 about such things, they said. Meaning 26:09 we are truly enjoying being lost in the 26:12 system. 26:13 Hm. 26:14 Repeat, Aan Talif. Repeat. 26:16 We are enjoying 26:18 he 26:19 the majority of this nation, including 26:21 its religious elites, political elites, 26:22 oligarchic elites, especially the 26:24 business oligarchic elites. 26:26 Are enjoying being lost. 26:28 H 26:29 look. It's been one generation, and the 26:31 statement that it's been one generation 26:33 was already stated during a crisis 26:34 period. He. 26:36 That the monetary crisis 26:38 which turned into a multidimensional 26:41 crisis is happening again. What is a 26:43 multidimensional crisis? Once again, I 26:46 have also conveyed clearly, 26:48 a multidimensional crisis is marked by 26:51 three things. Social distrust, social 26:55 disorder, social disobedience. Replace 27:00 "social" with "political": political 27:02 distrust, political disorder, political 27:03 disobedience. Replace "political" with 27:06 "economic." Resulting in economic 27:09 distrust, 27:11 economic disorder, economic 27:13 disobedience. 27:15 Finally, people are talking. Yes, 27:18 finally it's true, malls are using 27:19 fences now, there's no smoke without 27:21 fire. This makes us suspicious as well, 27:25 what is behind, uh, what is this, the 27:28 turmoil, the fire beneath the husks, 27:30 right? 27:32 Okay, I will prove it with numbers now. 27:34 Hmm. 27:35 I am not using those people's research, 27:37 okay. I am not using surveys because 27:38 the term is survey. 27:40 I am not using data from those research 27:42 groups. 27:43 I am just using government data. Hmm. 27:45 Isn't that interesting? 27:46 Yes. We use it 27:48 as is. Eh, this, Brother, it's not just 27:53 some RC with 2,000 or 3,000 people, not 27:55 at all. Go ahead, Brother. 27:56 Yes. This data is concrete. The data is 27:59 concrete. What is that data? 28:01 SBN rose to 7.29. 28:07 Scary, right? 28:08 Yes. That's scary, that's huge. Maybe 28:12 the biggest in Asia. 28:14 7.29 SBN. My God, I was shocked. 28:18 Shocked. 7.29. 28:20 I cross-checked with 28:21 wow, that must be usury, right? 28:23 Oh, is that so? 28:24 It’s certain that little people 28:26 paying dearly means little people are 28:28 funding the rich, right? 28:29 Now, let's continue, listen first, okay 28:31 . All right. 28:34 So that we know that 28:35 how this thing called error is being 28:37 continued, you know. 28:40 SBN interest rate 28:42 state treasury or what is called 28:43 government bonds. Government securities 28:46 , those state securities, right. 28:48 7.29. 28:50 I was curious, so I compared it with 28:53 the so-called SRBI. 28:56 Right? 28:57 SRBI is the interest rate set by BI. 28:59 Wow, that's intense. 29:02 Hmm. 29:02 The 6-month one is 7.3. The 6-month one 29:07 . 29:07 The 6-month is 7.3. 29:09 The 12-month one is 7.7. Wow. 29:12 Yeah. They're competing. 29:17 They're competing. Done. Hmm. 29:19 That's the monetary aspect we're 29:20 looking at. From monetary, we shift to 29:22 fiscal. 29:23 Yeah. 29:24 In fiscal, it's admitted that 490 29:26 regional governments are having trouble 29:28 paying salaries. That is caused by 29:33 the transfer allocation to the regions 29:37 decreasing. Now, it's clear, 29:39 misallocation and disallocation. 29:43 Regions get creative, KPK acts, this 29:45 becomes a dilemma, right? That. So 29:50 that's what I proved, that when little 29:52 people are forced to fund the rich 29:54 through SBN 29:56 Hmm. 29:58 You are forced to pay taxes, right? 30:00 Taxes from that, the payment is tax, 30:01 right? 30:02 Because when, because when, because 30:04 when MUI talks about taxes 30:07 I don't understand. 30:09 No, I don't understand their way of 30:11 thinking about taxes, turns out the 30:13 basis is fiqh. Sorry, uh, sorry, 30:19 friends. Even though some of you like 30:21 to have dialogues with me, but 30:23 this is how it is. So it's natural if 30:25 you don't invite me, I can understand 30:27 that. 30:29 No. 30:29 And I'm not asking to be invited either 30:30 . Not asking to be invited either. 30:32 Yes, that's right. 30:33 Later I'll become a trouble maker, they 30:36 say, right? 30:38 Done. So that was the data: SBN data, 30:41 SRBI data, and the data of 490 regional 30:44 governments having trouble paying 30:46 salaries. 30:48 Hmm. 30:48 Can you imagine, 490 compared to 524. 30:54 So only a few tens are still able to 30:56 pay salaries, and then 490 are not. And 31:00 then Tito Karnavian 31:01 Hmm. 31:02 As the Minister of Home Affairs, asks 31:04 the Minister of Finance 31:05 for the revenue-sharing funds to be 31:07 disbursed. Wow. Yeah. There is 31:11 disallocation and there is 31:12 misallocation. 31:13 Hm. 31:15 It was disallocated because it was 31:17 moved to MBG as the Constitutional 31:19 Court proved. 31:20 Hm. 31:22 The disallocation, the misallocation. 31:23 H 31:24 a misallocation earlier, yes. 31:26 Misallocation or allocation failure is 31:28 proven by the Constitutional Court 31:29 decision. 31:30 The Constitutional Court decision. 31:30 Right? Yeah. 31:31 Okay. Well, here is the proof, we use 31:33 data, again using data. Now, the 31:37 misallocation is proven by the BGN 31:39 being corrupted. 31:41 Hm. Real again. That's clear. 31:43 Real again. H. 31:46 So, it means it is natural that what is 31:49 emerging now is political, social, and 31:52 economical distrust. H 31:56 that is natural. So, that chain of 31:59 events, I will also convey this later 32:01 on a TV station. But because I have 32:05 been at Rasil for 8 years, I speak at 32:07 Rasil first, right? 32:08 True. Go on. 32:11 So it means that the chain of events 32:13 proves that it is indeed natural to 32:15 have social, political, and economical 32:18 distrust. When the law has spoken, I 32:21 speak first on a private station. He 32:23 like that. I have spoken first many 32:25 times at Rasil as well, right? 32:28 If social, economical, political 32:30 distrust emerges, then it is natural 32:32 that the popularity and public trust in 32:35 Prabowo Subianto declines. 32:38 Hm. 32:39 Like that. That. So, the core issue is 32:43 them, right? 32:45 Hm. 32:46 Correct in diagnosing. 32:48 Hm. 32:49 Even though using that method, but 32:52 wrong in treating. Wrong in the effort 32:56 to heal, wrong in the effort to cure. 33:00 Look, they only made a shadow cabinet. 33:02 They only made a shadow parliament. 33:06 They only made a PPHN. The root of the 33:08 problem is not about the PPHN. The root 33:11 of the problem is not just a shadow 33:13 parliament or a shadow cabinet to make 33:15 it look like there is opposition so 33:16 that there is vibrant aspiration, no, 33:18 not that. This is not—if you use an 33:23 approach—if you use my approach, it's 33:25 called a functional approach. 33:30 Whereas our problem is not just in the 33:32 function, our problem is, as I termed 33:34 it in a podcast with someone. Yes. 33:37 Our problem is not just the functional 33:39 approach, our problem is structural and 33:41 fundamental. And that fundamental lies 33:43 in its actors, in its constitution. Now 33:48 , that cycle constantly runs 33:50 economically, constantly runs, 33:52 politically constantly runs for a 33:54 generation. Socially, it constantly 33:57 runs for a generation. So, as I said in 34:01 98 34:03 Indonesia will lose a generation. 34:06 Proven. 34:08 Oh my God. La hawla wa la quwwata. 34:11 81 years of independence and it's just 34:13 the same, right? It's a headache, this 34:16 country. 34:17 That is 34:17 now, when we realize 34:19 h 34:19 81 years we have been independent and 34:21 it's just like this, right? 34:24 The problem is just the same, we. It 34:26 means we actually have no progress. 34:29 Don't say infrastructure is progress. 34:32 He 34:33 that's physical status. 34:35 But the human development failed. We 34:38 talk about physical development without 34:40 talking about human development. Now, 34:42 when we talk about human development, 34:45 it is clearly proven you cannot use 34:47 Western concepts that failed for a 34:49 century. That is my lecture everywhere. 34:54 The West failed. A century. 34:57 And the West is also changing right now 34:58 , isn't it, brother? Let's, uh, move 35:01 abroad for a bit, brother. 35:03 Since we only have 5 minutes left 35:05 anyway. And this change is happening 35:08 alongside the chaotic American economy, 35:10 and it seems political changes as well. 35:14 In Michigan, there's another, uh, 35:16 member of parliament who will soar like 35:19 Zohran. What is actually happening in 35:23 Uncle Sam's land and its influence on 35:24 us? Before we talk about Zohran and 35:28 Michigan, 35:29 let's first look at the story of how 35:31 the protests of American citizens, 35:34 uh, 35:36 reveal that we have been helping Israel 35:38 , which has committed genocide and 35:39 crimes against humanity. 35:44 That protest emerged and was then 35:46 responded to by the authorities, by the 35:47 regime. 35:48 They said that is the left wing. 35:53 That is what I was saying. What I said 35:56 was, it's part of a social conflict, 36:01 part of the collapse of social ties 36:04 that is now also happening in Indonesia 36:07 . 36:07 Now, the situation to answer, to 36:10 address, uh, the vulnerability of 36:12 social ties, the erosion of family life 36:15 , and the messy state of community life 36:18 , with the addition of natural 36:20 disasters—both extreme heat and 36:22 flooding everywhere. Alib doesn't 36:27 mention, uh, about how heat waves, 36:29 doesn't mention those massive floods 36:32 anymore, right? 36:35 That 36:36 actually, if we look at things like 36:38 that, 36:39 they are also looking for answers. So, 36:44 the case of Zohran, who overcame 36:45 various budget constraints but 36:47 succeeded in bringing prosperity to the 36:49 people of New York, right? Oh, that's 36:52 how the phrase goes. Zohran succeeded 36:53 in handling salary payments. Zohran 36:56 succeeded in handling the health 36:58 insurance issue. How to reduce crime, 37:01 those sentences appeared, you see. 37:03 Meaning, in other words, 37:07 there are segments of American society 37:09 that are also looking for alternative 37:12 answers for guidance in life. 37:15 Well, they are answering some of it 37:17 with Islam. 37:18 The same thing is happening in Europe. 37:21 But at the same time in Europe, such 37:23 things are also being opposed. Just as 37:26 they are opposed in America. What's the 37:28 point? It really is a clash of 37:29 civilizations, truly a religious war, 37:32 that's the story. 37:34 MashaAllah. Now, but still, still, what 37:38 is called "Rabbana ma khalaqta hadha 37:42 batilan subhanaka faqina 'adhaban-nar" 37:46 shows that the truth can never be 37:49 defeated. It can be cast aside, but one 37:53 day, because it cannot be defeated, 37:55 right? 37:57 It will always return to the surface. 37:59 That is balance, that is mizan. 38:01 Uh. 38:02 Exactly. So that is Archimedes' law, 38:05 that is the law of mizan, that is the 38:07 law of substitution, 38:08 that is "I have created all things in 38:11 balance," that is how I see it. 38:13 That is how the world is changing right 38:15 now. Isn't that right, brother? Is this 38:17 , uh, what is it? 38:18 If we want, we want to examine the 38:20 change again, right? 38:23 Uh, the change is clear that when 38:25 society will eventually be locked by 38:28 digital games, 38:31 underline my simple statement. Uh. 38:34 When society is locked by what is 38:36 called digital usage, at that moment, 38:39 the peak point of civilizational 38:42 vulnerability has actually reached its 38:44 time. So, the period when civilization 38:48 is so vulnerable, human civilization is 38:50 so vulnerable, is when humans are 38:52 totally directed by the games of 38:53 automation, robotization, and AI. 38:57 Young people today ask about 38:58 jurisprudence, what do they ask? 38:59 ChatGPT. They don't go to the Ustaz 39:01 anymore. 39:02 Yeah. This is what becomes the problem. 39:04 Yeah. 39:06 It means, again, the big question is 39:10 where is the guidance for mankind? 39:11 Where is the guidance for the righteous 39:13 ? 39:14 That the Qur'an can never be replaced 39:16 by anything. Irreplaceable. 39:19 Its spirit 39:20 is irreplaceable. How is the proof of 39:22 its irreplaceability? Easy. I have 39:26 proven it, not just with my fingers, 39:28 with the number of my fingers. I proved 39:31 that ChatGPT loses and is wrong. 39:35 Even sometimes, I could even call it 39:37 nonsense. I tell them, "Oh yes, sorry, 39:39 you are absolutely right, we are 39:41 talking nonsense.""Oh, they really 39:42 admit it.""Usually, they are pitted 39:45 against another AI, only then do they 39:47 ...""But it's fair, they are open, but 39:49 behind that, someone is setting it up, 39:50 aren't they, brother?" 39:53 Now, when the question is like that, it 39:56 depends on two things. 39:58 Hm. First, who becomes the algorithm's 40:01 feeder? 40:01 Who is the feeder? 40:03 This algorithm feeder input, it's 40:05 processed by a machine, right? 40:07 Yes. 40:08 This machine process fulfills three 40:10 conditions. Consistency, coherence, 40:13 correspondence. But because the initial 40:16 input is realism, the initial input is 40:18 phenomenology, 40:22 the initial input is materialism, then 40:24 what is processed by the machine with 40:26 the principles of consistency, 40:28 coherence, and correspondence still 40:29 remains subject to materialism. Yeah. 40:33 So the appearance of jurisprudence or 40:35 the appearance of the Qur'an within it 40:37 is only a casing, 40:40 it's just a surface, it's just simple. 40:45 If you say there is intelligence, how 40:47 so? Well, intelligence in the speed of 40:49 answering, intelligence in making such 40:51 a great casing. They do touch on 40:54 content. 40:56 A little content is touched, but when 40:58 pushed for comprehensiveness, pushed 40:59 for consistency, oh wait a minute. 41:02 Especially when pushed with a model, if 41:05 using Nursi's language on ChatGPT, use 41:07 the Nursi approach with a methodology 41:10 of knowledge and a system configuration 41:13 equipped with feedback. Look, try to 41:16 answer. That is the basis of the Qur'an 41:18 . So hit that thing called AI with such 41:21 a model, it gets dizzy. It gets dizzy. 41:24 Masyaallah. 41:27 Because the algorithm feeder is not 41:28 guided by the knowledge of the Qur'an, 41:30 it cannot answer. 41:32 Let me repeat. The algorithm feeder is 41:34 not based on the knowledge of the 41:35 Qur'an. 41:36 Yes. So when we pursue, as I said, how 41:40 is the methodology of knowledge, how is 41:41 the system configuration, how is the 41:43 feedback loop system that is locked 41:44 with the triple consistency, coherence, 41:46 and correspondence? 41:48 With the 5C approach: casing, content, 41:51 comparison, consistency, ChatGPT cannot 41:54 answer. Masyaallah. That means the 42:01 Qur'an is truly, the Qur'an is truly 42:03 the incomparable knowledge, the 42:05 incomparable guidance. I want to say 42:08 that. So from that whole system that I 42:11 mentioned earlier, when people 42:14 are so thoroughly squeezed by 42:16 automation, by robotization, by AI, 42:18 that is the peak of civilization's 42:20 vulnerability. That is where Islam is 42:24 felt to be very, very much needed. It 42:28 is true that it is the guidance for 42:29 mankind. Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi 42:37 wabarakatuh. 42:38 Waalaikumsalam warahmatullahi 42:40 wabarakatuh. 
